| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130513 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 18 '16 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
61% 102 Pts
|
20% 151 Pts
|
10% 156 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6519
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
14% 17.7 fps
|
17% 20.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
67.3%
Good
|
88% 116 MB/s
|
114% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
|
62%
Good
|
77% 102 MB/s
|
66% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
|
52.4%
Above average
|
69% 91.4 MB/s
|
88% 0.81 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.1%
Average
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
49% 81 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 434 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 70x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 50x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 27x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $146 |