Packard ISTART F2312

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard ISTART F2312 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard RC415
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070418
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	May 17 '16 at 14:17
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 35.7 29% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 39.5 8-Core 45.3 6% 42.4 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 823 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1637 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 33 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 77 61 167503724567 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7432124516 (F7) Unknown 100 100 234004389 (F8) Unknown 100 100 291042777	37.9% Below average	Read 181 Write 207 Mixed 203 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 12.6 57% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16.8 DQ Write 29.4 DQ Mixed 14.3 13% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 25GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 96 124250926 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10870 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 622860843 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5747 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9786 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 54 420741145 (C2) HDA temperature 25 46 47244640281 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 92 64 71490894 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.3% Poor	Read 36.5 Write 41 Mixed 35 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.68% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 1.7 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard ISTART F2312

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)