Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 13:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 187
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 384
48% 365 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 153
Parallax 129
112% 140 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
53GB free
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 113 134 139 107 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 440
Write 164
Mixed 135
SusWrite 118
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 18.9
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 41.3
47% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 97 98 109 110 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 99
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 102
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 9.4 8.4 9.2 9.6 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 6
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.6
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.4
136% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GNT Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNT Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback