Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '18 at 17:23
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 198 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 339 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 65.7 57% 67.9 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 65.1 Splatting 68.2 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSLAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 185 161 309 340 240 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 427 Write 407 Mixed 394 SusWrite 249 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 32 93% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 286 221% 302 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 304GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 98 103 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 138 Write 158 Mixed 39 SusWrite 100 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 8945 GKE800UD51208-2133AH 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.9% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 20.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	381x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	352x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	399x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	345x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	114x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	55x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16