Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '18 at 14:47
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4330-$140 6,343 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 94.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 198 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 274 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 18.8 16% 18.2 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.8 16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 372 147 125 99 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 410 Mixed 374 SusWrite 179 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 55.1 174% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 275 223% 316 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 102GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 349 Write 130 Mixed 191 49% 224 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 39.2 135% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 96.6 DQ Mixed 141 106% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 117 Write 102 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 8.8 87% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 61%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 6GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.2 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 49 Write 53.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 0.8 39% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 99GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 29 33 30 30 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 58 Write 61 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 32.6 62% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 63%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 36 Write 34 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 34.9 44% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 37,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	132x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16