| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E4C-A07CO |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131101 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 04:45 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
| CPU Throttled | 94% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron B820
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.8%
Below average
|
28% 34.4 Pts
|
8% 61.5 Pts
|
4% 65.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.42%
Terrible
|
0% 0.57 fps
|
1% 0.91 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.1%
Below average
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
38% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 152x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |