PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5KPL (all builds) |
Memory | 0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091111 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '18 at 18:08 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5440
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
MSI(1462 2326) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD Smartbuy 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 162 208 212 103 23 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
57GB free
Firmware: VT100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
General UDisk 16GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 6 6 6 MB/s
|
4.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $17Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |