| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110224 |
| Uptime | 13.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 07 '18 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
67.7%
Good
|
66% 106 Pts
|
34% 246 Pts
|
18% 295 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
4.05%
Terrible
|
4% 5.01 fps
|
4% 5.19 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INTENSO 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 78 272 283 122 292 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
57% 254 MB/s
|
87% 30.1 MB/s
|
38% 56.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
420GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 117 118 117 117 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
68% 92.3 MB/s
|
97% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
19% 25.3 MB/s
|
132% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
47.4%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 22x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 16x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $196 |