Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive13.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '18 at 02:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 66
2-Core 219
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 349
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 149 166 180 114 107 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.9% Very poor
Read 69.7
Write 155
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 143
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.4
8% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
443GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 77 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 66.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 70.1
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback