Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 59.6 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 197 65% 118 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 690 65% 542 Pts	64-Core 1,027 64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 580 3,114 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 0517) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 87.7 55% 73.9 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 56.9 52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 203 227 259 205 276 MB/s Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	78.2% Very good	Read 210 Write 99.5 Mixed 132 SusWrite 240 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 38 135% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 206 182% 271 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 89 97 97 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 85.1 Write 57.6 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 90.5 47% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 113%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 484GB free Firmware: 04.05G11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 80.5 Write 69.1 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 73.7 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 127GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 71 71 69 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 89.3 Write 82.3 Mixed 81.6 SusWrite 70.2 60% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 807GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 29 30 30 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 21 Write 37.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 28.1 22% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x4GB 13,050 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 11 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16