Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '18 at 19:24
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 663 65% 533 Pts	64-Core 967 60% 967 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 227C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 89 58% 73.8 fps	MRender 61.5 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 77.8 56% 66.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT21L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 207 199 213 210 217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 460 Mixed 310 SusWrite 231 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 50.1 173% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 335 256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 111GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 77 80 76 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 332 Write 118 Mixed 176 SusWrite 79.6 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 34.2 127% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 86.3 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 94.3 74% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 294GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 56 52 35 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 16.2 Write 26.7 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 50.9 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 477GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 85 75 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 98 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 81.3 61% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 201 200 201 200 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 144 Write 55 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 198 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 30.7 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 24.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16