HP 870-244

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 870-244 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 830C
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '18 at 00:38
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 117 2-Core 223 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 402 49% 375 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 36.4 32% 35.4 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 38 Splatting 35.6 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 93 68 97 96 81 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 420 Write 4.8 Mixed 270 SusWrite 86.1 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 24.4 121% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 139 132% 202 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 172 174 175 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 164 Mixed 103 SusWrite 173 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 7,552 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-244 Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: HP 870-244

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	385x
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples	1x
Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	326x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBHP $54Bench 179%, 2,407 samples	8x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 73%, 7,552 samples	166x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	73x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16