PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '18 at 21:50 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2760) 3GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
4.62%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 16 18 18 18 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
90GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 239x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 134x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 64x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $616 |