Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160119
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '18 at 02:14
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 127 51% 85.7 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 187 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0831C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 33 32 20 48 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 319 Write 307 Mixed 15 SusWrite 42.6 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 0.9 28% 8.07 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 10.9 10% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 36 33 21 49 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 107 Write 136 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 43.7 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 82%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 202GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 12.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 19.2 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1600 12GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.8% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples	36x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	35x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	36x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	31x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	10x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	15x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16