Average Bench: 47.9% (857th of 1442)

Based on 5,111 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF0001067A Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9500 @ 2.83GHz

Below average average bench

The Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 averaged 52.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 68.6Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 159Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 is just 13.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 162Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 161Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,111 samples)
Min Avg Max
56.4 Memory 68.6 77.3
34.3 1-Core 42.4 48.5
66.6 2-Core 84.2 96.2
42% 65.1 Pts
Min Avg Max
105 4-Core 159 185
113 8-Core 161 187
21.3% 160 Pts
Min Avg Max
112 64-Core 162 186
10% 162 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 72.9
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 86.6
44% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 163
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Socket775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 62.3
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 88
41% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 159
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 60.2
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 89.2
40% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 174
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 58.4
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 89.1
40% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 172
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
5,111 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,722,355 CPUs tested

Typical Core2 Quad Q9500 Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $288

Popular Core2 Quad Q9500 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9500 (6M Cache, 2.83 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)
Code NameYorkfield
Processor NumberQ9500
# of Cores4
Cache6 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography45 nm
VID Voltage Range0.8500V-1.3625V
Recommended PriceN/A
Clock Speed2.83 GHz
Bus Speed1333 MHz FSB
Max TDP95 W

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Demand Based SwitchingNo

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets SupportedLGA775
Processing Die Size164 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors456 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

2 years ago.

Not fast but still great upgrade for tinkering with older C2D systems


Good

4 years ago.

Faster than my internet, snappy performance even 2019. Processor cost twenty dollars.


Your
opinion?
1442 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback