IntelBX80677G4560
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.5GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 383,250 user samples
70,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 631st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
57.3 % 60.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75.4 Pts 81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
90.6 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+41%
64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
159 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+30%
122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
227 Pts +3% 221 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
239 Pts 341 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+43%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 91.8 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
104 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+42%
73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
187 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+31%
143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
275 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
279 Pts 397 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+42%
Market Share
Based on 67,696,121 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % 0.08 % Much higher market share.
+60%
Value
Value For Money
105 % Much better value.
+40%
74.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % More popular.
+18%
57 %
Price
Price (score)
$31 Much cheaper.
+76%
$130
Age
Newest
87 Months Much more recent.
+37%
138 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
54 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+57%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
2 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+300%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+14%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
278 Pts 411 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+48%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
241 Pts 353 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+46%
Series
CPU Architecture
Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 610 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel G4560 is one of the first Pentium processors to feature Hyper-threading. This means that although the G4560 only has two physical processing cores, it is able to process four threads in parallel by sharing resources between the physical cores. This typically results in a 50% performance improvement over two physical cores alone. Comparing performance between the lowest spec Kaby Lake i3 7100 and the Pentium G4560 shows that in terms of both performance and specs, very little separates them (even virtualization technology VT-d is present on the Pentium). The Pentium does lack AVX 2.0 (Advanced Vector Instructions) and it trails the i3 7100 by 400 MHz (10%) but there is no longer a clear divide between Pentiums and Core i3s. Intel have achieved an almost continuous distribution of performance levels for each price point from the cheapest Pentium to the top end i7-7700K[Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback