COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Intel
AMDFD6300WMHKBOX
▲ 534,728 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.0GHz, Core.
Release date: Q1 2008.

VS
▲ 5717,200 ▼

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+37%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 330,147 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
68,540 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 24% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 24% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 1058th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
261,607 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 675th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		40.3 % 55.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
Average Score 
+80%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		67.9 Pts 79.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		41.2 Pts 56.7 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+38%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		73.8 Pts 104 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+41%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		76.9 Pts 176 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+129%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		78.1 Pts 217 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+178%
Overclocked Score 
+78%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		78.9 Pts 89 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+13%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		48.1 Pts 68.5 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+42%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		95.5 Pts 124 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+30%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		95.4 Pts 215 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+125%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		95.4 Pts 265 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+178%
Value & Sentiment 
+112%
Market Share
Based on 67,708,928 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.02 % 0.09 % Hugely higher market share.
+350%
Value
Value For Money 		55.2 % 85.3 % Much better value.
+55%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		53 % 57 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score) 		$89 $57 Much cheaper.
+36%
Nice To Haves 
+102%
Age
Newest 		195 Months 138 Months More recent.
+29%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		130 Watts 95 Watts More energy efficient.
+27%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		2 cores 6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		2 threads 6 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		45 nm 32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3 GHz 3.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3 GHz 4.1 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+37%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		95.4 Pts 275 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+188%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		78 Pts 226 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+190%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Core Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA775 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 40.3%
Average Bench 55.2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 is amongst the fastest of the Core 2 Duo range of now nearly ten year old CPUs. The E8400 is included in our group tests simply as a reference point due to its huge success back in its day. Running at a clock speed of 3.0 GHz the E8400 has an effective speed of 52 which is 85% slower than its modern day counterparts. The relative lack of performance is especially noticeable in the area of multi-core processing as a consequence of the E8400's relatively few two cores. Anyone considering an upgrade needn't hesitate as modern CPUs are not only orders of magnitude faster but also considerably more energy efficient and feature packed. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere. [Sep '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
68,540
261,607
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback