UserBenchmark: AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i7-5820K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX80648I75820K

BUY • $130

AMDFD6300WMHKBOX

BUY • $47

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 363,301 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

101,694 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 68% Great: 88%

SPEED RANK: 281^st / 1442

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

261,607 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 62% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)

Poor: 44% Great: 62%

SPEED RANK: 676^th / 1442

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 40%

Jet ski


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		76.8 %	Much faster effective speed. +39%		55.2 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	86.4 Pts	Slightly lower memory latency. +9%	79.2 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	96.3 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +70%	56.7 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	192 Pts	Hugely faster dual-core speed. +85%	104 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	364 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +107%	176 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	594 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +174%	217 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	94 Pts	Slightly lower OC memory latency. +6%	89 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	120 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +75%	68.5 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	237 Pts	Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +91%	124 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	462 Pts	Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +115%	215 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	737 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +178%	265 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,718,208 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.18 %	Hugely higher market share. +200%	0.06 %
Value Value For Money	94.7 %	Slightly better value. +5%	89.9 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	66 %	More popular. +16%	57 %
Price Price (score)	$130		$47	Much cheaper. +64%


Age Newest	116 Months	More recent. +16%	138 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watts		95 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +32%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		6 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads	Hugely higher thread count. +100%	6 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	22 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +31%	32 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.3 GHz		3.5 GHz	Slightly faster base frequency. +6%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	3.6 GHz		4.1 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +14%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	933 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +239%	275 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	748 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +231%	226 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Haswell-E	Piledriver
Socket Motherboard Socket	LGA2011-V3	AM3+
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers. ^{[Sep '14 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere. ^{[Sep '13 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback