COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I74771
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
▲ 54741 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2013.

VS
▲ 6913,313 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Effective Speed 
+6%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 155,655 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
11,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		73.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6% 		69 %
Average Score 
+1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		84.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20% 		70 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		101 Pts +4% 96.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		193 Pts +2% 190 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		340 Pts 366 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		512 Pts 640 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+25%
Overclocked Score 
+9%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		93.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+19% 		78.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		111 Pts 116 Pts +5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		220 Pts 233 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+6%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		406 Pts 456 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+12%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		571 Pts 798 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+40%
Value & Sentiment 
+56%
Market Share
Based on 67,718,584 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.02 % 0.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+250%
Value
Value For Money 		90.8 % Better value.
+19% 		76.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		54 % 69 % More popular.
+28%
Price
Price (score) 		$129 Much cheaper.
+34% 		$195
Nice To Haves 
+52%
Age
Newest 		130 Months 85 Months Much more recent.
+35%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		84 Watts 65 Watts More energy efficient.
+23%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17% 		3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5% 		3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		573 Pts 1178 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+106%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		519 Pts 980 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+89%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4600 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 73.5%
Average Bench 69%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i7-4771 is the same as the i7-4770 apart from a 100 MHz increase in base clock from 3.4 GHz to 3.5 GHz. In theory this increase will only impact multi-core workloads because both processors have the same turbo clock of 3.9 GHz which should be engaged during single and dual core workloads. On multi-core workloads the turbo needs to be disabled in order to maintain acceptable core temperatures and operating frequencies drop to base clock where the i7-4771 has a marginal 100 MHz or 2.9% advantage. In other words the two processors should be largely identical. Looking at the i7-4770 vs the i7-4771 benchmarks verifies this. Both the 4770 and 4771 are the current top end mainstream market leaders but for the vast majority of desktop users they are probably overkill as typical consumer use rarely requires more than two cores. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
11,180
144,475
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback