COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I74770K
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
▲ 6413,763 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

VS
▲ 522,560 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+23%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 178,526 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
172,887 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 327th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 583rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		73.6 % Faster effective speed.
+23% 		59.9 %
Average Score 
+47%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.6 Pts +5% 81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		101 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+58% 		63.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		192 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+63% 		118 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		334 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+61% 		207 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		497 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+50% 		332 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+47%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		96 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5% 		91.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		122 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+61% 		75.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		232 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+63% 		142 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		403 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+61% 		251 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		609 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+43% 		425 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,714,956 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.38 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		92.7 % Much better value.
+79% 		51.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		64 % More popular.
+23% 		52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$120 Much cheaper.
+75% 		$471
Nice To Haves 
+3%
Age
Newest 		133 Months 115 Months More recent.
+14%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		84 Watts More energy efficient.
+12% 		95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6% 		3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.9 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		620 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+46% 		426 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		513 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+53% 		336 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4600 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 73.6%
Average Bench 59.9%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i7-4770K is Intel's fourth generation (codename Haswell) flagship processor in the hugely successful Core range. It's not surprising that the 4770K sets a new Real World Performance index record, besting its predecessor by just over 9%. The 4770K also tops out in the remainder of our benchmarks setting new highs of 10020 and 2164 in the PassMark and PassMark Single Thread tests which equates to roughly an 8% overall performance increase over the 3770K. With a TDP of 84 watts, power consumption has increased slightly over the 3770K. The new Core i7-4770K demonstrates around an 8% performance increase over its predecessor the 3770K but it costs 12% more. As a result, at least until prices drop, this processor represents marginally worse value for money than the 3770K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
172,887
5,639
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback