COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80677I57600K
AMDFD8320FRHKBOX
▲ 7518,182 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 564,740 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 301,460 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
195,006 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 297th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
106,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 605th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		75.8 % Faster effective speed.
+29% 		58.5 %
Average Score 
+69%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6% 		80.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		120 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+104% 		58.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+112% 		112 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		379 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+90% 		200 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		403 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+32% 		306 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+75%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5% 		90.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		144 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+109% 		68.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		286 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+117% 		132 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		490 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+108% 		236 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		504 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+36% 		371 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+52%
Market Share
Based on 67,708,414 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.29 % Hugely higher market share.
+190% 		0.1 %
Value
Value For Money 		84.1 % Better value.
+16% 		72.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		75 % Much more popular.
+34% 		56 %
Price
Price (score) 		$190 $129 Much cheaper.
+32%
Nice To Haves 
+1%
Age
Newest 		87 Months Much more recent.
+37% 		138 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		91 Watts More energy efficient.
+27% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9% 		3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz +5% 4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		510 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+34% 		382 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		407 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+28% 		318 Pts
Specifications 
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM3+
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 75.8%
Average Bench 58.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-8320 has the same architecture and specs as the FX-8350, the only difference being the base/turbo clocks of 3.5/4.0 GHz for the 8320 vs 4.0/4.2 GHz for the 8350. Comparing the two models shows that the 8320 lags the 8350 at stock speeds by around 10% but broadly matches it when both processors are overclocked. This combined with the 8320's considerably lower price tag makes the 8320 the better value proposition. In terms of outright performance, as with all AMD CPUs, the FX series have very strong multi-core performance but lag Intel considerably in terms of single and dual-core throughput. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
195,006
106,454
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback