6 Cores, 6 Threads
@3.5GHz Piledriver (2012)

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 52,248 user samples
19,244 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 945
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 49%
33,004 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 5.15 GHz
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 41% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 247th / 945
Gaming 51%
Desktop 53%
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.4 % Much faster effective speed.
50.8 % -60%
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
110 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
70.7 Pts -56%
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
414 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
238 Pts -74%
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
424 Pts Much faster multi-core speed.
324 Pts -31%
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
128 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
83 Pts -54%
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
504 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
294 Pts -71%
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
506 Pts Faster OC multi-core speed.
403 Pts -26%
Market Share
Based on 2,896,108 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.8 % -100% 1.6 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
90.1 % Slightly better value.
79.7 % -13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % Slightly more popular.
64 % -9%
Price (score)
$223 -61% $88 Much cheaper.
44 Months More recent.
52 Months -15%
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
84 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
95 Watts -12%
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores -50% 6 cores Much higher core count.
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads -50% 6 threads Much higher thread count.
Manufacturing process
22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
32 nm -31%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz -3% 3.5 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.8 GHz -8% 4.1 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
130 Pts Much faster single-core int speed.
89.3 Pts -46%
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
130 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
77.2 Pts -68%
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
513 Pts Much faster quad-core int speed.
310 Pts -65%
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
512 Pts Hugely faster quad-core fp speed.
265 Pts -93%
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
514 Pts Faster multi-core int speed.
409 Pts -26%
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
514 Pts Much faster multi-core fp speed.
354 Pts -45%
CPU Architecture
Haswell (2013) Piledriver (2012)
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1150 AM3+
Integrated Graphics
HD 4600 None

The Intel Core i5-4670K is the latest middle tier desktop processor from the fourth generation of Intel's Core range codenamed "Haswell". In terms of raw performance this processor slightly bests its predecessor the 3570K achieving approximately 10% higher server benchmark scores. In terms of real world performance the single core improvements are more relevant as more than two cores are rarely used for most typical consumer tasks and these have also improved by around 10% over the 3570K. It's not all good news though as the price increase of 14% more than offsets the performance improvements. This processor currently represents approximately the same value for money as its predecessor, the i5-3570K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]


The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere[Sep '13 CPUPro]


Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $346Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Pentium G4560 $75AMD RX 480 $175Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $570SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $123SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback