6 Cores, 6 Threads
@3.5GHz Piledriver (2012)

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 31,321 user samples
10,829 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Worst: 64% Best: 96%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 913
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 49%
20,492 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 42% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Worst: 42% Best: 60%
SPEED RANK: 227th / 913
Gaming 51%
Desktop 52%
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.5 % Much faster effective speed.
50.6 % -61%
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
110 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
70.3 Pts -56%
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
414 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
237 Pts -75%
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
427 Pts Much faster multi-core speed.
325 Pts -31%
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
129 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
80.7 Pts -60%
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
501 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
287 Pts -75%
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
506 Pts Faster OC multi-core speed.
393 Pts -29%
Market Share
Based on 1,752,722 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.6 % -31% 2.1 % Much higher market share.
Value For Money
88.5 % Better value.
75.6 % -17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
65 % -2% 66 % +2%
Price (score)
$234 -57% $100 Much cheaper.
39 Months More recent.
47 Months -17%
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
84 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
95 Watts -12%
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores -50% 6 cores Much higher core count.
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads -50% 6 threads Much higher thread count.
Manufacturing process
22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
32 nm -31%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz -3% 3.5 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.8 GHz -8% 4.1 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
126 Pts Much faster single-core int speed.
87.8 Pts -44%
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
130 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
75.5 Pts -72%
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
494 Pts Much faster quad-core int speed.
302 Pts -64%
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
507 Pts Hugely faster quad-core fp speed.
259 Pts -96%
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
494 Pts Faster multi-core int speed.
404 Pts -22%
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
510 Pts Much faster multi-core fp speed.
343 Pts -49%
CPU Architecture
Haswell (2013) Piledriver (2012)
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1150 AM3+
Integrated Graphics
HD 4600 None

The Intel Core i5-4670K is the latest middle tier desktop processor from the fourth generation of Intel's Core range codenamed "Haswell". In terms of raw performance this processor slightly bests its predecessor the 3570K achieving approximately 10% higher server benchmark scores. In terms of real world performance the single core improvements are more relevant as more than two cores are rarely used for most typical consumer tasks and these have also improved by around 10% over the 3570K. It's not all good news though as the price increase of 14% more than offsets the performance improvements. This processor currently represents approximately the same value for money as its predecessor, the i5-3570K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]


The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere[Sep '13 CPUPro]


Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2016 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: DX9 and DX10 3D performance.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Share page
The Best.
Intel Core i7-6700K $308Nvidia GTX 970 $264Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i5-6600K $237Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i7-4790K $316AMD R9 390 $306Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $157
WD Black 1TB (2013) $69HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $49G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $93SanDisk Extreme 32GB $20
WD Black 6TB (2015) $280Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $16
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback