COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I34150
AMDYD170XBCAEWOF
▲ 533,203 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2014.

VS
▲ 7012,326 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 103,097 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
36,627 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 34% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 674th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
66,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 58% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 380th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		55.2 % 71 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
Average Score 
+66%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		73.3 Pts +5% 70.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		85.3 Pts 103 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+21%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		150 Pts 202 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+35%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		216 Pts 386 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+79%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		223 Pts 674 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+202%
Overclocked Score 
+59%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+15% 		79.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		99.5 Pts 116 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		180 Pts 226 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		267 Pts 444 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+66%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		267 Pts 813 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+204%
Value & Sentiment 
+43%
Market Share
Based on 67,752,479 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+100% 		0.03 %
Value
Value For Money 		91.8 % Better value.
+22% 		75.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		53 % 70 % Much more popular.
+32%
Price
Price (score) 		$44 Hugely cheaper.
+81% 		$225
Nice To Haves 
+147%
Age
Newest 		119 Months 85 Months More recent.
+29%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		54 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+43% 		95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		2 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+300%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz +3% 3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		267 Pts 1183 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+343%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		226 Pts 1032 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+357%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4400 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 55.2%
Average Bench 71%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i3-4150 is successor to the i3-4130 2013 Haswell processor. Looking at the 4150 and 4130 side-by-side shows that the only difference between the two processors is a 100 MHz base clock increase from 3.4 GHz on the older 4130 to 3.5 GHz on the newer 4150. The marginal 2.9% clock speed increase brings an equally marginal performance boost. Despite the academic performance gain over it's predecessor, thanks to its excellent single-core performance, the i3-4150 is still an extremely capable desktop CPU and will handle the vast majority of regular desktop computing without breaking a sweat. Coupling the i3-4150 with a discrete GPU will satisfy all but the toughest of gaming requirements. Only the lower powered but significantly cheaper Pentium G's offer better value for money. [Jun '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn't due for release until next week but two of our users have already submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and single core scores from our samples shows a relative 4.3% boost on the single core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t fully engaged (12% turbo boost expected). These preliminary results are seriously impressive as they put Zen’s IPC between 0% and 9% below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Even in the worst case scenario these results are still impressive. Comparing Intel’s $1,000 6900K and the 1700X shows that AMD delivers comparable performance for half the price! A shake-up of the CPU market will unfold as Zen rolls out. If Ryzen CPUs can overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will likely dominate the entire market putting a very welcome end to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years. [Feb '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
36,627
66,470
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback