AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 77,632 user samples
58,208 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 51st / 1128
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
19,424 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 1128
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
83.9 % 99.6 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
99.9 Pts 120 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+20%
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
390 Pts 464 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+19%
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1114 Pts 1291 Pts Faster multi-core speed.
+16%
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
116 Pts 126 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+9%
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
459 Pts 493 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1306 Pts 1386 Pts Slightly faster OC multi-core speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 10,956,513 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.81 % 1.09 % Much higher market share.
+35%
Value
Value For Money
94.9 % 96.2 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
116 % More popular.
+20%
97 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 Much cheaper.
+34%
$320
Age
Newest
18 Months 5 Months Much more recent.
+72%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Slightly newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+23%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+16%
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
111 Pts 122 Pts Slightly faster single-core int speed.
+10%
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
120 Pts 132 Pts Slightly faster single-core fp speed.
+10%
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
442 Pts 476 Pts Slightly faster quad-core int speed.
+8%
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
481 Pts 514 Pts Slightly faster quad-core fp speed.
+7%
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
1269 Pts 1347 Pts Slightly faster multi-core int speed.
+6%
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
1322 Pts 1394 Pts Slightly faster multi-core fp speed.
+5%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by about 10%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by four or less cores but the 2700X offers unbeatable value for money for workstation users. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback