Real World Speed
Performance profile from 23,677 user samples
23,677 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 1089
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
86.8 % 93.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
109 Pts 123 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+13%
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
420 Pts 463 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+10%
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
906 Pts Slightly faster multi-core speed.
+11%
814 Pts
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts 138 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16%
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
471 Pts 532 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+13%
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1015 Pts Slightly faster OC multi-core speed.
+10%
926 Pts
Market Share
Based on 8,443,572 CPUs tested.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
101 % 118 % More popular.
+17%
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.89 % 1.72 % Hugely higher market share.
+94%
Price
Price (score)
$200 Cheaper.
+21%
243 USD
Value
Value For Money
100 % 102 % +2%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 83.3 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+14%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Slightly higher core count.
+8%
5.56 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Higher thread count.
+29%
9.33 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Slightly newer manufacturing.
+6%
14.9 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz +2% 3.54 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4.16 GHz +4%
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
114 Pts 134 Pts Faster single-core int speed.
+17%
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
124 Pts 141 Pts Slightly faster single-core fp speed.
+14%
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
453 Pts 518 Pts Slightly faster quad-core int speed.
+14%
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
490 Pts 549 Pts Slightly faster quad-core fp speed.
+12%
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
984 Pts Slightly faster multi-core int speed.
+11%
886 Pts
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
1019 Pts Slightly faster multi-core fp speed.
+7%
955 Pts
Age
Newest
12 Months More recent.
+21%
14.6 Months
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen (2017)   —
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4   —
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None   —
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 1600X is the flagship processor from AMD's latest generation of Ryzen 5 processors which feature the Zen architecture. Following on from last month's release of the Ryzen 7 series, the Ryzen 5 series is positioned as a less expensive mid-performance alternative to Intel's i5 mainstream offerings. Once again, AMD excels in multi-core technology. Like the Ryzen 5 1600, the 1600X features 6 cores and 12 threads, but has roughly 11% higher clock speeds (out of the box) for a 14% premium. Like all Ryzen CPUs the 1600X is unlocked. The 1600X is the only Ryzen 5 CPU with a TDP of 95W, the 1600, 1500X and 1400 all have 50% lower power consumption of 65W. Due to its high thread count, UserBenchmarks show that at stock clocks the 1600X outperforms the i7-7700k on multi-threaded tasks by 23%, but it lags behind by 23% for single and 14% for quad-core performance. The 1600X is priced keenly at $249 so a more appropriate CPU comparison is the i5-7600k where the 1600X wins on stock multi-core by a whopping 81%. The 1600X does represent great value for workstation users that also game but its $30 cheaper sibling, the 1600 (non x version), which includes a cooler and has great overclocking potential out of the box is arguably the the value king in this segment. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback