AMDYD160XBCAEWOF
AMDFD8320FRHKBOX

8 Cores, 8 Threads
@3.5GHz Piledriver (2012)

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 72,622 user samples
24,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 1100
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
48,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 41% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 297th / 1100
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+70%
51.4 %
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
110 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+58%
69.7 Pts
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
423 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+69%
251 Pts
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
916 Pts Hugely faster multi-core speed.
+111%
434 Pts
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+46%
81.7 Pts
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
471 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+56%
302 Pts
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1017 Pts Hugely faster OC multi-core speed.
+92%
529 Pts
Market Share
Based on 8,488,958 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.85 % Much higher market share.
+60%
0.53 %
Value
Value For Money
101 % Much better value.
+34%
75.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
101 % Much more popular.
+49%
68 %
Price
Price (score)
$199 $106 Much cheaper.
+47%
Age
Newest
12 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
66 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz +3% 3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4 GHz
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
115 Pts Much faster single-core int speed.
+31%
87.8 Pts
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
124 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
+64%
75.7 Pts
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
455 Pts Much faster quad-core int speed.
+42%
321 Pts
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
491 Pts Much faster quad-core fp speed.
+78%
276 Pts
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
985 Pts Hugely faster multi-core int speed.
+84%
535 Pts
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
1022 Pts Hugely faster multi-core fp speed.
+120%
464 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen (2017) Piledriver (2012)
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 1600X is the flagship processor from AMD's latest generation of Ryzen 5 processors which feature the Zen architecture. Following on from last month's release of the Ryzen 7 series, the Ryzen 5 series is positioned as a less expensive mid-performance alternative to Intel's i5 mainstream offerings. Once again, AMD excels in multi-core technology. Like the Ryzen 5 1600, the 1600X features 6 cores and 12 threads, but has roughly 11% higher clock speeds (out of the box) for a 14% premium. Like all Ryzen CPUs the 1600X is unlocked. The 1600X is the only Ryzen 5 CPU with a TDP of 95W, the 1600, 1500X and 1400 all have 50% lower power consumption of 65W. Due to its high thread count, UserBenchmarks show that at stock clocks the 1600X outperforms the i7-7700k on multi-threaded tasks by 23%, but it lags behind by 23% for single and 14% for quad-core performance. The 1600X is priced keenly at $249 so a more appropriate CPU comparison is the i5-7600k where the 1600X wins on stock multi-core by a whopping 81%. The 1600X does represent great value for workstation users that also game but its $30 cheaper sibling, the 1600 (non x version), which includes a cooler and has great overclocking potential out of the box is arguably the the value king in this segment. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-8320 has the same architecture and specs as the FX-8350, the only difference being the base/turbo clocks of 3.5/4.0 GHz for the 8320 vs 4.0/4.2 GHz for the 8350. Comparing the two models shows that the 8320 lags the 8350 at stock speeds by around 10% but broadly matches it when both processors are overclocked. This combined with the 8320's considerably lower price tag makes the 8320 the better value proposition. In terms of outright performance, as with all AMD CPUs, the FX series have very strong multi-core performance but lag Intel considerably in terms of single and dual-core throughput. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $176AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback