AMDYD150XBBAEBOX
AMDFD9590FHHKWOF

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.7GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 96,147 user samples
70,038 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 56% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 56% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 469th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
26,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 4.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 531st / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
66.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5%
63.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
71.8 Pts 81.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+13%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+46%
70.6 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
192 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+44%
133 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
329 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+35%
243 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
503 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+29%
390 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
79.5 Pts 92.1 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+16%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
114 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+39%
82.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
222 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+39%
160 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
381 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+30%
294 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
574 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+19%
482 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,708,233 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
81.6 % Much better value.
+32%
61.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
61 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$131 Much cheaper.
+56%
$298
Age
Newest
84 Months Much more recent.
+35%
129 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+70%
220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+34%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 5 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+35%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
584 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+22%
479 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
521 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+32%
396 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The quad core and octa threaded Ryzen 1500X is a sub-$200 chip based on AMD's latest Zen architecture. It is released this month as part of the Ryzen 5 launch – a mid-market range specced out to challenge Intel's i5 series and yield considerably better multi-threaded performance at budget prices. Comparing the i5-7600K shows that the 7600K is 20% faster for single and quad core workloads but looses by 20% for multi-core workloads. The Ryzen 5 line-up also includes the 6 core 12 threaded 1600X. By comparison, the 1500X is 24% less expensive, comes with a Wraith Spire cooler and impressively yields very similar single and quad core performance, but multi-core performance lags 50% behind the 1600X. Both chips can be overclocked, but out the box, the base and boost clock speeds are 3.5GHz and 3.7GHz for the 1500X and 3.6GHz and 4.0GHz for the 1600X. The 1500X is a very reasonable CPU for the money, which thanks to AMD's recent IPC improvements, punches far above its weight for multi-threaded performance by Intel's standards. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback