Average Bench: 108% (7th of 1117)

Based on 4,824 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 8.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 2,268Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,320Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is just 19.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Single Core Integer Speed 107Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 112Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,824 samples)
Min Avg Max
97 SC Int 107 115
105 SC Float 116 124
101 SC Mixed 112 120
89.4% 112 Pts
Min Avg Max
382 QC Int 419 455
415 QC Float 454 493
392 QC Mixed 435 472
98.8% 436 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,814 MC Int 2,268 2,596
1,529 MC Float 2,354 2,681
1,569 MC Mixed 2,320 2,664
347% 2,314 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 114
SC Float 121
SC Mixed 118
94% 118 Pts
QC Int 446
QC Float 488
QC Mixed 459
105% 464 Pts
MC Int 2,423
MC Float 2,492
MC Mixed 2,426
367% 2,447 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 112
SC Float 122
SC Mixed 118
94% 117 Pts
QC Int 419
QC Float 479
QC Mixed 442
101% 447 Pts
MC Int 2,276
MC Float 2,406
MC Mixed 2,347
351% 2343 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
SC Int 114
SC Float 117
SC Mixed 115
92% 115 Pts
QC Int 407
QC Float 455
QC Mixed 434
98% 432 Pts
MC Int 2,370
MC Float 2,484
MC Mixed 2,430
364% 2,428 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 100
SC Float 113
SC Mixed 109
86% 107 Pts
QC Int 410
QC Float 440
QC Mixed 432
97% 428 Pts
MC Int 2,281
MC Float 2,398
MC Mixed 2,342
351% 2,340 Pts
4,824 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 9,728,744 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
AmazonUS $75011 mins
NeweggUS $7505 hrs
EbayUS $82416 mins
BHPhotoUS $9471 month
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 1,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 146%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $2,190

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price.

 Comments

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game....

Added 11 months ago.

Good

2 days ago.

I've got real issues solving strong dependent problems at this CPU. It seems as if caches are not shared, which makes a huge dropdown in performance, compared to other many core cpus.


Excellent

8 days ago.

Cheap, affordable. Huge performance.


Excellent

6 days ago.

best cpu. Good values ​​with low load. low heat


Excellent

27 days ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.


Excellent

17 days ago.

Grate and chip


Excellent

23 days ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation


Excellent

1 day ago.

gOOD


Excellent

1 month ago.

next revision of TR at 14++nm or 7nm will be something so so special... but now long life AMD !


Excellent

9 days ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.


Excellent

1 month ago.

Amazing perfomance for that price


Excellent

2 months ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.


Excellent

4 days ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core


Excellent

1 month ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."


Excellent

1 month ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?


Excellent

1 month ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)


Good

11 months ago.


Excellent

1 month ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper


Excellent

1 month ago.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17


Excellent

3 months ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core


Terrible

9 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Excellent

3 months ago.

PRICE!!!


Excellent

7 months ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.


Excellent

9 months ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram


Good

2 months ago.

Intel has an 18 core processor that gets about 10% more performance than this, but it is $1000 more. Not sure who in their right mind would buy an intel i9 over Ryzen options when the price is so different and performance not so much. I love intel for gaming and have the i7-8700K, but for video editors and/or media professionals AMD is the clear winner in this category for best value.


Excellent

10 months ago.

Extremely fast


Excellent

11 months ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!


Excellent

6 months ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.


Your
opinion?
1117 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $225AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback