Average Bench: 107% (9th of 1122)

Based on 5,301 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 6.6% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 2,224Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,287Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is 27.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Single Core Integer Speed 106Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 110Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,301 samples)
Min Avg Max
94.5 SC Int 106 115
103 SC Float 115 124
98.8 SC Mixed 110 120
88.1% 110 Pts
Min Avg Max
361 QC Int 412 451
380 QC Float 448 491
371 QC Mixed 429 469
97.4% 430 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,221 MC Int 2,224 2,569
1,277 MC Float 2,332 2,682
1,265 MC Mixed 2,287 2,648
342% 2,281 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 112
SC Float 121
SC Mixed 112
92% 115 Pts
QC Int 414
QC Float 451
QC Mixed 433
98% 432 Pts
MC Int 2,321
MC Float 2,443
MC Mixed 2,391
357% 2,385 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 104
SC Float 113
SC Mixed 109
87% 109 Pts
QC Int 416
QC Float 448
QC Mixed 433
98% 433 Pts
MC Int 2,202
MC Float 2,334
MC Mixed 2,317
342% 2,284 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
SC Int 105
SC Float 114
SC Mixed 110
88% 110 Pts
QC Int 414
QC Float 446
QC Mixed 429
97% 430 Pts
MC Int 2,222
MC Float 2,337
MC Mixed 2,286
342% 2,282 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
SC Int 72.9
SC Float 79.8
SC Mixed 76.4
61% 76.4 Pts
QC Int 293
QC Float 318
QC Mixed 305
69% 305 Pts
MC Int 1,634
MC Float 1,718
MC Mixed 1,702
252% 1,685 Pts
5,301 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 10,301,358 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
EbayUS $7097 mins
AmazonUS $7391 min
NeweggUS $7703 hrs
BHPhotoUS $9472 months
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 143%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $429

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $2,076

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game...

Added 12 months ago.

Terrible

11 days ago.

Too slow due to caching problems.


Excellent

9 days ago.

süper


Excellent

1 month ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.


Excellent

5 days ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation


Excellent

12 days ago.

Barato e Eficiente


Good

15 days ago.

Grate and chip


Good

1 month ago.

next revision of TR at 14++nm or 7nm will be something so so special... but now long life AMD !


Excellent

15 days ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.


Poor

8 days ago.

i love this beast


Excellent

3 months ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.


Excellent

1 month ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core


Excellent

2 months ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?


Excellent

3 months ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."


Excellent

12 days ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)


Good

12 months ago.


Excellent

2 months ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper


Excellent

29 days ago.

Really nice high performance multicore CPU.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17


Excellent

4 months ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core


Terrible

10 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Excellent

5 months ago.

PRICE!!!


Excellent

8 months ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.


Excellent

10 months ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram


Good

4 months ago.

Intel has an 18 core processor that gets about 10% more performance than this, but it is $1000 more. Not sure who in their right mind would buy an intel i9 over Ryzen options when the price is so different and performance not so much. I love intel for gaming and have the i7-8700K, but for video editors and/or media professionals AMD is the clear winner in this category for best value.


Excellent

12 months ago.

Extremely fast


Excellent

12 months ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!


Excellent

7 months ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.


Good

1 month ago.

Price point now massively better and the benchmark software is now being optimised for Ryzen so scores will improve over the already max optimised intel variants.


Your
opinion?
1122 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback