Average Bench: 109% (7th of 980)

Based on 1,436 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 8.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 2,302Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,368Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is 20.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Single Core Integer Speed 108Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 112Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,436 samples)
Min Avg Max
96.8 SC Int 108 117
106 SC Float 117 125
100 SC Mixed 112 121
89.9% 112 Pts
Min Avg Max
356 QC Int 417 456
384 QC Float 450 492
370 QC Mixed 434 473
98.3% 434 Pts
Min Avg Max
2,016 MC Int 2,302 2,614
2,077 MC Float 2,398 2,714
2,057 MC Mixed 2,368 2,704
353% 2,356 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
SC Int 114
SC Float 122
SC Mixed 118
94% 118 Pts
QC Int 413
QC Float 489
QC Mixed 468
103% 457 Pts
MC Int 2,586
MC Float 2,680
MC Mixed 2,682
397% 2,649 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
SC Int 113
SC Float 122
SC Mixed 117
94% 117 Pts
QC Int 449
QC Float 487
QC Mixed 465
106% 467 Pts
MC Int 2,580
MC Float 2,673
MC Mixed 2,688
397% 2,647 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
SC Int 113
SC Float 121
SC Mixed 117
94% 117 Pts
QC Int 449
QC Float 485
QC Mixed 466
106% 467 Pts
MC Int 2,574
MC Float 2687
MC Mixed 2,648
395% 2,636 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
SC Int 112
SC Float 123
SC Mixed 117
94% 117 Pts
QC Int 424
QC Float 446
QC Mixed 443
99% 438 Pts
MC Int 2,286
MC Float 2372
MC Mixed 2,335
349% 2,331 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
SC Int 99.9
SC Float 114
SC Mixed 110
86% 108 Pts
QC Int 406
QC Float 444
QC Mixed 426
96% 425 Pts
MC Int 2202
MC Float 2,282
MC Mixed 2,256
337% 2,246 Pts
1,436 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 6,329,219 CPUs tested.

 Prices

EbayUS $87810 mins
AmazonUS $8987 mins
BHPhotoUS $90548 mins
NeweggUS $9501 hr
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 141%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,918

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

 Comments

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game....

Added 4 months ago.

Poor

20 days ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.


Excellent

12 days ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation


Excellent

12 days ago.

Because its cheaper


Excellent

7 days ago.

Much needed AMD presence in CPU arena. Support it and everybody will gain.


Excellent

22 days ago.

next revision of TR at 14++nm or 7nm will be something so so special... but now long life AMD !


Excellent

7 days ago.

threads over cores people


Good

7 days ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.


Excellent

12 days ago.

loved it


Excellent

1 month ago.

amd passion


Excellent

18 days ago.

sooooo guuut


Good

12 days ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.


Good

4 months ago.


Terrible

7 days ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and shit works and it works well."


Excellent

2 months ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)


Excellent

4 months ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper


Excellent

12 days ago.

Beast!!!!! R.I.P Intel


Excellent

4 months ago.

AMD 4 WIN Bcuse of da price


Excellent

1 month ago.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17


Excellent

2 days ago.

its so coool


Excellent

13 days ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core


Terrible

2 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Excellent

13 days ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.


Excellent

2 months ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram


Excellent

4 months ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!


Excellent

3 months ago.

Extremely fast


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 67 pages, please contribute.


980 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback