Average Bench: 61.4% (176th of 980)

Based on 7,820 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00600F20, 178BFBFF00600F12 Model: AMD FX(tm)-9590 Eight-Core Processor

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Above average average bench

The AMD FX-9590 averaged 38.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 552Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 524Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-9590 is just 18.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-9590 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Quad Core Floating Point Speed 266Pts
Single Core Floating Point Speed 74.9Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 7,820 samples)
Min Avg Max
74.6 SC Int 91.9 102
61.1 SC Float 74.9 83.8
67.4 SC Mixed 82.4 90.6
66.5% 83.1 Pts
Min Avg Max
269 QC Int 329 380
216 QC Float 266 310
246 QC Mixed 300 340
67.7% 298 Pts
Min Avg Max
415 MC Int 552 604
330 MC Float 445 516
382 MC Mixed 524 593
76.4% 507 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
SC Int 95
SC Float 79.3
SC Mixed 88.7
70% 87.7 Pts
QC Int 326
QC Float 280
QC Mixed 317
70% 308 Pts
MC Int 574
MC Float 490
MC Mixed 560
82% 542 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
SC Int 104
SC Float 80.8
SC Mixed 91
74% 91.9 Pts
QC Int 326
QC Float 272
QC Mixed 307
68% 302 Pts
MC Int 610
MC Float 474
MC Mixed 569
83% 551 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
SC Int 89.3
SC Float 75.2
SC Mixed 87.6
67% 84 Pts
QC Int 321
QC Float 266
QC Mixed 302
67% 296 Pts
MC Int 579
MC Float 455
MC Mixed 551
80% 528 Pts
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
SC Int 81.2
SC Float 70.8
SC Mixed 77.8
61% 76.6 Pts
QC Int 317
QC Float 256
QC Mixed 290
65% 288 Pts
MC Int 551
MC Float 432
MC Mixed 494
74% 492 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
SC Int 78.2
SC Float 69.1
SC Mixed 72.9
59% 73.4 Pts
QC Int 291
QC Float 248
QC Mixed 275
62% 271 Pts
MC Int 489
MC Float 415
MC Mixed 479
69% 461 Pts
7,820 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 5,505,333 CPUs tested.

 Prices

EbayUS $109.9920 mins ago.
AmazonUS $129.4012 mins ago.
NeweggUS $141.988 days ago.
Send price feedback
Typical FX-9590 Builds (Compare 3,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $940

Popular FX-9590 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

 Comments

AMD Unleashes First-Ever 5 GHz Processor...

Added 3 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

12 days ago.

I have an oc 8320 at 4.8ghz i was hoping since it is a higher model it would get more oc head room out of this chip but it couldn't get higher than my 8320. Even then it used more power and made my room a sauna. not even a good sauna. lol

Comment 

More cache, 8 cores, cheaper MB, have 20+ applications open still fast.—Sep '14

Comment 

Great multithreaded performance, but at 220W, this chip is a beast. I like this chip, but Intel's chips are considerably more efficient in terms of power consumption.—Oct '14

Comment 

I heard mixed reviews of the 9590, but when prices dropped picked on up and my MB already supported it. It has worked great, rock solid for me in ASrock extreme 9 MB. No problems, but hard to overclock so I keep it stock with Corsair H80 cooler. Mine system tested above average on all tests and my rig is strictly budget, so that's good. I don't think I could get more value for the dollar than what I have in my rig. Great CPU!—Oct '15


Good

11 days ago.

For 150£ today its very good value for an 8 core cpu it still will be much better than many i3 for that money


Good

1 month ago.

so good!!!


Excellent

1 month ago.

top


Good

16 days ago.

Love it


Poor

3 months ago.

WAWOOOOOOOOO VERY GOOOOOOODD


Above average

3 years ago.


Excellent

1 month ago.

fuck mother AMD fuck ass AMD


Terrible

28 days ago.

low perfomance for that price


Poor

2 months ago.

it low for 4k


Terrible

13 months ago.

This thing will probably start a fire if you don't use a watercooler with it. 220 watts is WAY too much for a small chip and this is basically an overclocked version of the FX 8350. There's literally no difference. Also it's not 8 cores. 4 CORES, 8 THREADS. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 30 pages, please contribute.


980 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $299Nvidia GTX 1070 $386Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $508Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $920SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback