Average Bench: 58% (198th of 980)

Based on 3,114 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00600F20 Model: AMD FX(tm)-9370 Eight-Core Processor

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Average average bench

The AMD FX-9370 averaged 42.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 521Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 494Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-9370 is 21.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-9370 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Quad Core Floating Point Speed 251Pts
Single Core Floating Point Speed 71.3Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,114 samples)
Min Avg Max
66.9 SC Int 86.8 98.5
58 SC Float 71.3 83.4
62.5 SC Mixed 78.4 89.6
63.1% 78.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
234 QC Int 308 364
203 QC Float 251 307
226 QC Mixed 283 336
63.7% 280 Pts
Min Avg Max
381 MC Int 521 603
328 MC Float 420 513
369 MC Mixed 494 588
72.1% 478 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
SC Int 97.7
SC Float 82.1
SC Mixed 90.8
72% 90.2 Pts
QC Int 335
QC Float 306
QC Mixed 332
74% 325 Pts
MC Int 517
MC Float 479
MC Mixed 560
78% 519 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
SC Int 93.4
SC Float 76.1
SC Mixed 84.5
68% 84.7 Pts
QC Int 354
QC Float 286
QC Mixed 315
72% 318 Pts
MC Int 564
MC Float 442
MC Mixed 529
77% 512 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
SC Int 93.9
SC Float 73.1
SC Mixed 81.7
66% 82.9 Pts
QC Int 299
QC Float 245
QC Mixed 289
63% 278 Pts
MC Int 557
MC Float 436
MC Mixed 522
76% 505 Pts
3,114 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 6,226,864 CPUs tested.

 Prices

NeweggUS $1524 months
OutletPCUS $1881 day
AmazonUS $1999 mins
EbayUS $20025 mins
Send price feedback
Typical FX-9370 Builds (Compare 6,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $816

Popular FX-9370 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 CPU Rankings.

Welcome to our desktop CPU comparison. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by price to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Calculated values don't always paint the whole picture so we check them against hundreds of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

 Comments

PCs with beauty and brawn, the best of both worlds...

Added 3 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Works perfectly. I've no problems. Doesn't go above 50 degrees Celsius during heavy gaming. (Mass Effect: Andromeda, Ultra preset, several hours.)


Average

3 years ago.


Terrible

2 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Below average

2 years ago.

Come on, AMD. Where is the competition?


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 23 pages, please contribute.


980 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $89G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback